About srcfy
Evidence for a fairer public conversation
An impact-focused archive to counter Islamophobia, document injustice and make source-based knowledge easier to find.
Our mission
srcfy is being built to defend Islam and Muslims against misleading claims and prejudice through accurate, source-based records and research. Where criticism of Islam or prejudice against Muslims enters public debate, we respond with sources, context and analysis.
Our wider vision asks fundamental questions about claims, fair treatment, peaceful coexistence and public life. We cover issues aligned with the common good, beyond any fixed list of topics.
What we hope to change. Help readers trace claims to evidence, challenge misleading narratives and understand issues beyond slogans.
Take a position. Do not preselect the findings.
Mission-led
The archive has an explicit concern for Islam, Muslims and peaceful coexistence. We say so openly rather than claiming to be neutral or unaffiliated.
Evidence-led
We apply the same standards to supportive and inconvenient evidence, and keep documented facts, allegations, interpretations and open questions apart.
Where we start
We start close to the evidence and expand only as carefully as verification allows.
- Kerala firstHands-on sourcing, local-language material, contextual checks and investigations.
- India nextStructured national collections, consistent definitions and verified cross-regional sources.
- Then globalBroader comparisons and historical research, with source-by-source human checks.
What we are working on first
Our early articles focus on three examples. They guide where we begin; they do not define or limit the mission.
- Violence. Documenting reported violence against Muslims in India, with scope and inclusion rules set before cases are compiled.
- Media. Examining Islamophobia in Indian media through dated examples, full context and consistent coding rules.
- Contributions. Building source-based collections on Muslim contributions to science and the betterment of society.
Questions we want to research
These are proposals, not conclusions. Periods, measures and source standards are defined before any comparison is made, and political or religious labels are never treated as findings.
- How can fair treatment of religions and peaceful coexistence be compared?
- What do the sources record about caste discrimination in access to housing, education and work?
- What is the evidence behind recurring media claims, and how often are they later corrected?
- How have communal-violence responses and institutional accountability compared over time?
- How did Muslim and Christian scholars contribute to medieval science, including through exchange?
- What does documented interfaith cooperation and local conflict resolution look like in practice?